Steve Jobs announced a new product that I personally had most shocking moments during the presentation. If you like to draw even Apple and Steve Jobs continues to this part of admiration even while writing an iPhone. Advertise with me, that can not be down there benefits such as manual paper. That UX (User eXperience) design. (To use a touch screen) who (as a way to select the desired place) Want a stylus? In using the touch screen fotosidan portion of the world that did not take into account any manufacturer. There is a problem for users who are not on the touch screen fotosidan using the touch screen and ahninya doeneunya and take some inconveniences, and at some point to ease development approach from a user experience point of view, the way that thou products. Now that Apple is the most competitive, which can be an icon of the global IT industry. 310HS reviews fotosidan of the Korea / Japan and East IT parts makers seem to be a lot of comments made in this perspective that ignores UX. Specifications and performance alone is no longer able to be a good product, try to evaluate the Canon 310HS with current standards.
Have the camera status are interested in a long period of time, you know Canon IXUS digital camera brand is not the brand Canon compact camera. That mean that there was a very old film camera in the brand. Using the APS film and film camera that boasts a very pretty little size IXUS line-up had been loved too many people. Small and light and reminiscent of a square form of refined charm punggyeo become IXUS coming fotosidan from the Gulf of byeoldol. Canon IXUS 310HS is this unfortunate thing unique charm and is the fact that the design seems a little far. It'd also IXUS lineup looks stylish square design, but this seemed a little tubakhae not it seem convenient and good value. I think such ways, rather 115HS and IXUS 220HS is more luxurious design. Large size real look coy. Guests expect a very small and stylish design egen Do not you judge only slightly designs am not a picture that might give a good impression, try it before you buy the real thing.
However, the basic design as the compact cameras are very good. The bright fotosidan F2.0 lens, particularly fotosidan where the advantage in ISO 100 with a built-in ND filter support so that the pattern can not only F1.8 bright during the day as opposed to an absolute part of the Nikon P300 was not quite write. Canon 310hs the know speak only manual manipulation of a bit, no matter fotosidan how bright or if you put a fully automatic, no matter how dark is yet another compact camera also significantly less chance of failing fotosidan than a compact camera to take a picture.
The most common scene is a scene. The existing test smacked the smoke as I deliberately false information. (Sorry.) F2.0 taken with a very clear picture in daylight. Canon 310HS has emerged thanks to the natural picture on the built-in ND filter, Nikon P300, of course, go beyond the shutter fotosidan speed is 1/2000 has been over-exposed. If you've a little bit more facts would shutter speed in low light with F2.0 Oh you know there could have been up only 1/800 Anna ㅎㅎ Anyway, the Canon 310HS is designed to take full advantage of its basic specification with a camera at night as well as daytime In that regard, as a high proportion snap camera with a compact camera, I think part of admirable enough. I felt as Canon 301HS camera (picture) is shown below. fotosidan
1. Excellent image quality is Nikon P300 than one Samsung EX1 / Olympus XZ-1 / Panasonic LX5 / less than 100% in the Canon G12 just saying fotosidan this is a common situation when viewed close-up little difference in viscosity better than Nikon's high-end shaving less than nine minutes it should be impossible. 2. The overall tone is still bright feeling like the traditional canon. Only green, but the primary emphasis of the red light is still strong fotosidan pieces, portraits fotosidan made sure that the color does not make a huge difference compared to Nikon. That is not a landscape picture because there is no need to choose the Canon 310HS color portraits. 3. If you talked to inaccuracies in some of the AF Nikon P300 review this failure more apparent if lacking, but even more common, are not used enough to be a problem with the judge. fotosidan General users will determine the length of would be more successful photo shoot haneunge fotosidan understand the basic picture-taking skills than you care to have AF. This degree. First, the biggest point yireotgo, because beyond this range can vary a lot depending on the preferences of each individual fotosidan to judge deurini made up the sample fotosidan compared to the previous judge it, seems to me to be nice to add to the question is important to become familiar questions. ^^
Canon 310HS VS Nikon P300 compared PART5. Compare color portraits! Canon 310HS VS Nikon P300 compared PART4. Night Photo sample comparison! Canon 310HS VS Nikon P300 compared PART3. Video recording sample comparison! Canon 310HS VS Nikon P300 compared PART2. Automatic device-specific exposure characteristics compared !! Canon 310HS VS comparison Nikon P300 review PART1. Snapshots comparison!
Touch screen on the camera is supposed to parallel operation of several labor not suited to quickly correct interface. But if you have already given a touch screen watch only the most basic principles I would not have the user does not feel "uncomfortable" feeling to use the camera. fotosidan 310HS is not a problem of the touch screen or not?. Just use a resistive touch screen UI (that is dragged to the left and down motion weeks) haetdaneunge type of gesture is a problem. This is not a disadvantage. The camera arm badly'll express that thought, that this means that if you completely ignore the deception and consumers to use. Resistive fotosidan touch screen is not a bad thing unconditionally. Geomyeon fotosidan write a resistive touch screen should not write such a gesture would UI scheme. fotosidan Press each time to stay up all nails should drag to the left or right using the camera UI is how to move from side to side three weeks I have a feeling that despite jyeotneunde accustomed to going the way every time, not long enough. Even after a year does not seem to vary. Itdeonde Canon 310HS convenient touch screen that ad copy on the page are exposed to a lot of bloggers review a number written on the same side with the Naver search one asks. What are you guys something else with baby Rose? Need you wonder whether fotosidan these people ever touchscreen eoneujeongdona 310HS is uncomfortable? fotosidan If there is only one reason why you should not buy this nonsense 310HS That's right touchscreen.
Movie image quality of the Canon 310HS is basically "good". There is anxiety gripped zooming during movie recording but also be free, in normal circumstances, a good substitute camcorder. And touch below pre explain the frame part you worry about the basic specifications. 24fps is not a bad specification, the "other" is the specification. 24P has been in spite of it in the specifications required by the Sony A77 and the VG10 is a high price to high amateur video enthusiast or frame of video professionals, rather than end users with full-time standard used by film critics who bare the 24P is not supported . Of course, high frame of 30FPS / downside movement fotosidan may find this a little unnatural feeling at 60FPS faster than the scene still exists, but the overall picture of the feel (the same movie and) the unconditional fast enough better emotionally than the frame parts have unconditional shortcomings It is difficult to express with. However, the user side of the normal user experience that is your real compact camera. fotosidan That is if access to video-specific aspects of UX design Canon does not like much. First part bitrate. The Canon 310HS is FULL HD video compression standards up to 36mbps. If you think you have the best home camcorder from Sony it boasts that supports 24mbps, you can know how high. This number is far higher picture quality is good. But that's usually it is necessary to see ttajeo a valid Will in usage, gyeorkron is not valid. Instead, the user typically must endure disadvantages to implement the compression ratio is too big. First of capacity. 310HS video capacity of approximately 24 GB in FULLHD standards hour. Usually two and a half times the domestic camcorder. As an ordinary person, no matter how great memories yirajiman burden that capacity. File maximum capacity per file to support this approach before and after the window is 4 GB. Because digital cameras as well as camcorders, you can not save more than 4GB per file. To take only the old 24 GB 4 GB per file in one hour approximately 10-15 minutes or so, because the user did want to watch the desired compression ratio relative to damages in time. (Canon geonge is not the limit. And the fact that the level 10 minutes long time is not a problem.) For this reason, despite Canon 24P is equipped with a 36.8mbps the downside is circumstantial single phase. To apply the camcorder and DSLR's video engine developed on existing fotosidan indiscriminately. That would have not gone through the extra customization for end users, such as the Canon 310HS. Video is not the end haneunge shooting. After being taken to store, edit, haneungeot all important issues. fotosidan Movie Canon 310HS is the current standard quality is to fall down a lot, but compared to many in the usability of Competition Nikon P300 / Sony WX7 / 10. Not recommended.
Canon 310HS has an excellent noise restraint in the dark. (Please see sample images postings made to the existing night), but sadly not unique Canon 310HS. Only at night it does not quite excel excel more than the Competition in Nikon P300 and Sony WX7 / 10. Almost similar. For reasons of selection of the recording capacity is the BSI CMOS performance is represented in a dark place is 310HS
No comments:
Post a Comment