E-mail *

Professional lens for DX digital camera with aperture f / 2.8 and a price of $ 1500. Announced in July 2003. 17-55 f / 2.8 aperture zoom srednefokusnyy excellent but very expensive. You always nravylos tantsevat and You bы Hoteliers bolshe etom otdavat of time, but do not know the, Where it is possible to ymenno Sing, togda in Tacoma sluchae of help to you necessarily School tantsev Kiev, where You Excellent nauchytsya tantsevat and at etom will Receive infinite bolshuyu portsyyu udovolstvyya and happiness.
Its purchase can be justified for those who aperture value and versatility, such as reporter either. Newcomers such a lens 100% is required. Now 17-55 f / 2.8 is not justified expensive, so I do not see any reason to pay for f / 2.8 such a fortune. Having bought the 18-55 VR AF-S f / 3.5-5.6 and 35mm f / 1.8 you usually lose in versatility but win in the price, with quite significantly.
17-55mm f / 2.8 lens is certainly different from supershvydkisnym autofocus and metal body (weight lens - 760 ml). It was mehapapulyarna for digital photographers until 2008, but with the release of FX camera lens has lost its relevance and may be useful only units, as virtually all professionals have jumped ciate on the full-length type camera D700 and D3.
If you're new and you need a lens for self-defense - take the 17-55 f / 2.8 for $ 1500 :) I will say with confidence lens will be cheaper, it is prohibitively expensive. While FX cameras are exorbitant money, 17-55 f / 2.8 will hold approximately the same level, but they will fall in price, the price of 17-55 f / 2.8 significantly lowered.
E-mail *
It is possible to Require sleduyuschye HTML -tehy and Attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title = ""> <acronym title = ""> <b> ciate <blockquote cite = ""> <cite> <code> <del datetime = ""> <em> <i> <q cite = ""> <strike> <strong>