As I described permission, I had to show you what the old Canon EOS 400D with Canon Media and the loan obtained from the Canon EF 50mm f / 1.4 USM lens provides. If the soil be asked, so really pretty quality. The testing phase for a variety of demanding thinking of ways to test the quality of the combo. Well, from the garden found a trampoline, so, of course, opting for business photos. Was, therefore, about a million picture some stock serving 400D to all out and the end result you can see here. If otherwise, the fairy tale you read a few days ago a post about (the click), then a part of that post about the images that had just recreated described.
For almost ten years of age a camera quality is still pretty good and the controls it will certainly still be improved. wireimage As well as you can see, so much depends solely on the objective. If you have eg. The older one hundred series frame (500D, 550D, 600D, etc.), Which does not yet show any sign of clotting recommend, but feel free to change the lens
In some situations, I have experienced a 50mm focal length too long croppikennolla (APS-C) while shooting. Such cameras are Canon's most common amateur's & semi-professional cameras. Bring your cell means, therefore, that part of the picture are cut off, while the market remains täysikennoisella when shooting the film right size. This again is a pretty tirvia amateurs, and the aim was, therefore, only to make clear that at lower trunks wireimage of this lens is longer wireimage than the full sensor camera when shooting.
If the EF 50mm f / 1.4 USM price terrified, so the alternative is always higher general, the picture appears as the middle & the same focal length, the Canon EF 50 / 1.8 II lens. Hinteroa of 200-300 euros. A cheaper alternative, ie * EF 50mm f / 1.8 II (klick) to find such Pixmania website 103 euros, and that the charismatic * EF 50mm f / 1.4 USM (klick) lens, not in the same place for about 400 euros. The appearance of them is not a whole lot of difference, but the difference in weight does indeed know. Cheaper weighs 130 g, and the feel is quite plastic, while the more expensive option EF 50mm f / 1.4 USM weighs 290 g.
Some of the pictures were a little stripey, but it was due to the fact that we shot at a relatively low light and ISO value only (now considered crib), 100-200. I set the camera aperture f / 4.0 trampoline pictures and f / 1.6 portraiture. We S described with pictures of people just full aperture, that the latter would be too soft. But the most eyebrows raised because the old man how to bring your camera may not even be alive? I have read some of the blogs, the 1000D or 1100D cameras are already broken (they came much later on the market), and I can promise you that this camera is not really with much use since 2006. Of course, each camera model, wireimage shutter has its own lifetime, but we 400D has exceeded the reference period of several years ago.
Thus. Conclusion is that if someone is interested to buy this my new equivalent EF 50mm f / 1.8 II, so not to offer! I would in fact seriously wireimage buy that a little more advanced one. If you wake up some of these questions, then go ahead. It may be that I forgot to mention something really essential.
hey can you say that the erbB battery 50mm f 1.4 and 50mm 1.8? :) wanna namely folks to buy that kind of lens itelleni, mut, but I wonder, is it you do not 50mm f 1.8 as good? Reply Remove
The difference is in that light force, that is f / 1.4 is better than an intensity of f / 1.8. EF f / 1.4 is better wireimage suited for eg. Certain wireimage subjects and portraits, as it allows a better depth of field bokeh effect, that is, the background is more blurred than f / 1.8 with filming. In general, the maximum aperture (ie, beyond f / 1.8 when shooting cheaper versions images wireimage can already wireimage go a little soft, so that the more expensive f / 1.4 to give back a little bit bigger opening for use. That is, the EF 50mm f / 1.8 is good value for laatusuhteeltaa and EF 50mm f /1.4 still a bit of it better: D Delete
Ha, well I guess it does not really matter if you get any photos as you want. :) The principle is that the smaller wireimage the f-number of the lens on the side is found, the brighter it is, since you can use a larger aperture. So goes the opposite. Small value = large aperture (eg. F1.4) and lots of light, isonumeroinen f-value (such as f22) -> a small opening, a little light. Remove
Thank you! I think that 35 mm is also already a bit too long, as far as I'm the kind of testing. Perhaps the 30mm would be jees, and a Sigma can be found right at affordable prices. However, it is not a matter of experience, that is, I do not know whether what kind compared to similar priced 50mm. Canon equivalent (EF 35mm f / 1.4) does not then maybe not so yleislinssiksi suitable, as hintahan huitelee thousand better side? I mean, yeah fine, but do not think in general, any pocket :) Delete
Haha yeah! : D Somehow but the soil remains quite completely without first seeing wireimage those lenses just because I do not go too much
