This post is dedicated to my favorite, Canon 70-200milliselleni. I try to tell them, all my own exp

This post is dedicated to my favorite, Canon 70-200milliselleni. I try to tell them, all my own experience that kapineesta and I am happy to answer any questions if you encounter. Quote from Canon's website
"Bright EF 70-200 mm f / 2.8 L USM is a professional telephoto zoom lens that fits well, especially wildlife and sports photography, as well as weddings and portraits." Canon EOS 1100D + Canon EF 70-200mm f / 2.8L USM How I ended up doing just that pipe?
I missed the equipment of high quality zoom lens, which I would stay more moving objects (in my case mostly dogs) going along. At the bottom of the bag yeah rotation and rotates yes still 75-300mm tube, which is quite an unhappy vempele. Foot ZOOM So we went and I can tell you that it was difficult. In addition, the 50mm focus at the top of a friend of accurate motion images to achieve was pure luck game. At first I thought to invest in a new camera to the body, but more accurately as an afterthought, I would not have benefited from very little. I asked a few facebook group as well as private messaging experience the different themes of the photographers 70-200millisestä and I took a lot of pictures trash the dress taken in that tube. I was looking for a comprehensive data from different sources and always came only positive against. The gang boasted an infinitely fast lens focus, which is an essential criterion for shooting dogs, ranging from speech trash the dress also became the tube beautiful drawing and good image quality is maintained throughout the zoom range. 70-200millisen weather protection was also correct a plus because of all because it knows where muralikossa always be moved with the dogs. Cons was just a heavy weight, which did not bother me. The decision was pretty sure, the 70-200mm is just what I need. Canon EOS 1100D + Canon EF 70-200mm f / 2.8L USM Where to shop? The next step was a radar with a little prices and availabilities. I browsed the internet and in the end I realized check out Camera Store online store, which I had previously trash the dress shopped mm. 50mm hankie and I was very satisfied with the service. Initially, the price crunch ear really badly, but Instalment payment brought light into the cave. The lens I had to pay for, however, by mere mainostenjakurahoillani, where the pay is dizzying (at least not in a positive sense). A few months after the tuumailujen Canon EF 70-200mm f / 2.8L USM lens, however, left the order and waiting time was nerve-racking. Stock the product in question had just run out of time, which only prolonged the waiting trash the dress time even further. All in all, yes, I was very pleased trash the dress with the Camera Store service, and I got a quick information about the progress of your order. Canon EOS 1100D + Canon EF 70-200mm f / 2.8L USM Ensikosketus It's the long-awaited day arrived at last and arrived at the post office package. As soon as we went to pick it up and excited I carried the new frame extension at your fingertips. When I opened the package of millions of wrap films and plastics inside the finally revealed what I had been waiting for a long time. The lens was much greater, originally I had imagined and it really weighed down. Only then oikeastikkin I realized what people were talking about the weight. Runkokin (then still 1100D) looked so terribly pikkisriikkiseltä large lens in parallel, which is very much amused. Canon EOS 1100D + Canon EF 70-200mm f / 2.8L USM The first impression of the first kuvausreissujen during the sting immediately notice how heavy the lens tired hands after long kanniskelun. At the same time the weight was also helpful, since the camera was much more stable, for example, running a dog following. 70-200mm does not fit anymore in the same runkoni camera bag, so degrees shifted in the carriage more difficult. I put the camera always up and running at home, and I do not like vary pipes longer description of the location, so I no longer have the package in the same space. Anyway, yes, I noticed the difference as soon as pictures navigating through the computer. First of all, the number of unsuccessful frames dropped by half, and a description of the situation, I no longer räpsinyt ten sample to make sure a success. I trusted that it is sufficient to 1-3 main picture in the same situation, and now it is one räpsy has already been successful. I also do not shy away to use the full zoom, the quality of stay as good 70mm, the 200mm does. And what oleellesinta, kuvausintoni grew quite earth-shattering, and wanted to be a full-time camera in hand, in the yard. Canon EOS 1100D + Canon EF 70-200mm f / 2.8L USM Now Less than half a year is now being described 70-200mm and contain many times I do it from the nose of the camera is not irroittanut. Weight is no longer a problem, rather, is more enjoyable shooting a heavy 70-200mm, than, say, feather-light 50mm. I am in every way was not really happy with this kind of L-series, yes I would change anything. As I get it easily now normal repulla, where I've wrapped up the first bag and still fleezepeittoon. The included lens hood is also a remarkably good example, when shooting in the rain, or even a puppy with Jenkins. Lins